Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2001-04-26 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2001-04-26 House Journal Page 1247 SB 156 The following was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 156(RES) "An Act amending the Alaska Land Act to clarify the requirement of a single written best interest finding required for the sale, lease, or other disposal of state land or resources or an interest in them, and relating to certain disposals involving multiphased development; and providing for an effective date." 2001-04-26 House Journal Page 1248 with the: Journal Page O&G RPT 4DP 2NR 956 FN1: ZERO(DNR) 957 RES RPT 6DP 1NR 1AM 1065 FN1: ZERO(DNR) 1066 Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 5, line 23: Delete "are" Insert "will be" Page 5, line 23: Delete "adopted" Insert "to be promulgated" Page 5, line 24 following "department": Delete through line 26 Insert ";" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Fate objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 156(RES) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Guess, Hayes, Joule, Kerttula, Moses Nays: Bunde, Chenault, Coghill, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson 2001-04-26 House Journal Page 1249 Excused: Kookesh, Ogan Absent: Kapsner And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 5, line 22, following "proceed,": Insert "the department shall make a written finding and" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Fate objected. Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 2. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 4, line 30: Delete "may address only" insert "shall [MAY] address [ONLY]" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Fate objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 156(RES) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 2001-04-26 House Journal Page 1250 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Davies, Guess, Hayes, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Moses Nays: Bunde, Chenault, Coghill, Croft, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Excused: Kookesh, Ogan And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that CSSB 156(RES) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. Representative Berkowitz objected. The Speaker stated that CSSB 156(RES) will advance to third reading on the April 27, 2001, calendar.